State v. Becker

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Becker

7 P. 329, 12 Or. 318, 1885 Ore. LEXIS 44

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedJune 8, 1885

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 7 P. 329 (State v. Becker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Becker, 7 P. 329, 12 Or. 318, 1885 Ore. LEXIS 44 (Or. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of arson. A motion was made for a new trial, on the ground that one of the jurors had drank intoxicating liquors during the trial, and also on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. The motion was denied, hence this appeal. The questions raised are not the subject of an appeal, as has just been shown in the case of Kearney v. Snodgrass, ante, p. 311, and the authorities there cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of arson. A motion was made for a new trial, on the ground that one of the jurors had drank intoxicating liquors during the trial, and also on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. The motion was denied, hence this appeal. The questions raised are not the subject of an appeal, as has just been shown in the case of Kearney v. Snodgrass, ante, p. 311, and the authorities there cited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 P. 329, 12 Or. 318, 1885 Ore. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-becker-or-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack