State v. Becker
7 P. 329, 12 Or. 318, 1885 Ore. LEXIS 44
Opinion
The appellant was convicted of the crime of arson. A motion was made for a new trial, on the ground that one of the jurors had drank intoxicating liquors during the trial, and also on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. The motion was denied, hence this appeal. The questions raised are not the subject of an appeal, as has just been shown in the case of Kearney v. Snodgrass, ante, p. 311, and the authorities there cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Becker, 7 P. 329, 12 Or. 318, 1885 Ore. LEXIS 44 (Or. 1885).
7 P. 329 (State v. Becker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sing
229 P. 921 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)
State v. Evans
192 P. 1062 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1920)
State v. Pender
142 P. 615 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1914)
State v. Gardner
54 P. 809 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1898)
State v. Foot You
32 P. 1031 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1893)