State v. Beck

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Beck

269 S.W.3d 48, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1488, 2008 WL 4901751

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 12, 2008

DocketED 090537

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 S.W.3d 48 (State v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Beck, 269 S.W.3d 48, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1488, 2008 WL 4901751 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carl Beck (“defendant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court on his conviction of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. Defendant argues the court erred in admitting testimony and exhibits concerning a witness’s out-of-court identification of defendant, and the court *49 erred in admitting testimony regarding information given to a detective from an informant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI