State v. Beck

172 N.E. 925, 202 Ind. 700, 1930 Ind. LEXIS 57
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided July 3, 1930·No. No. 25,806.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The identical question involved in this case was decided by this court in State v. Billings (1929), ante 135, 168 N. E. 453. On authority of that case, the judgment herein should be affirmed. Each side has filed a petition for oral argument; but, as the counsel for both the appellant and appellee filed briefs in the Billings case on the petition for rehearing, which petition has been denied, it appears that an oral argument is not necessary. The petitions for oral argument are denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Beck, 172 N.E. 925, 202 Ind. 700, 1930 Ind. LEXIS 57 (Ind. 1930).

172 N.E. 925 (State v. Beck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Billings
168 N.E. 453 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1929)