State v. Bechtol

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bechtol

578 S.W.3d 861

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 30, 2019

DocketWD 81553

StatusPublished

This text of 578 S.W.3d 861 (State v. Bechtol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bechtol, 578 S.W.3d 861 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

Hunter D. Bechtol appeals his conviction following a jury trial on the class D felony of rape in the second degree. Bechtol asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his requests to exclude the victim from the courtroom during trial. Because a formal, published decision would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm Bechtol's conviction by summary order. A *862memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Hunter D. Bechtol appeals his conviction following a jury trial on the class D felony of rape in the second degree. Bechtol asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his requests to exclude the victim from the courtroom during trial. Because a formal, published decision would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm Bechtol's conviction by summary order. A *862memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 S.W.3d 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bechtol-moctapp-2019.