State v. Beccaria

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Beccaria

806 P.2d 1181, 106 Or. App. 425, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 469

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 20, 1991

DocketCF 90-105; CA A65906

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 806 P.2d 1181 (State v. Beccaria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Beccaria, 806 P.2d 1181, 106 Or. App. 425, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 469 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions on two counts of sodomy in the first degree. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to dismiss the charges for failure of the state to bring him to trial within 90 days after it received notice from him requesting a speedy trial. ORS 135.763.

The state concedes that this case is controlled by State v. Gilliland, 90 Or App 477, 752 P2d 1255 (1988), and that defendant’s motion to dismiss should have been granted.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions on two counts of sodomy in the first degree. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to dismiss the charges for failure of the state to bring him to trial within 90 days after it received notice from him requesting a speedy trial. ORS 135.763.

The state concedes that this case is controlled by State v. Gilliland, 90 Or App 477, 752 P2d 1255 (1988), and that defendant’s motion to dismiss should have been granted.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

806 P.2d 1181, 106 Or. App. 425, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-beccaria-orctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack