State v. Beavers

838 P.2d 644, 115 Or. App. 752
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 21, 1992·No. DCR89-12591; CA A71612 (Control); 91-985, CA A71613·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of felony driving while suspended (DWS), and his probation on an earlier theft conviction was revoked. Although he has appealed in both cases by a single notice of appeal, he assigns no error to the judgment in the DWS case. In the theft case, he asserts that the trial court lacked the authority to modify a previously ordered, but unexecuted, jail sentence by ordering that it be served consecutively to an unrelated prison sentence. The state concedes that defendant is correct, and we accept the concession.

CA A71613 affirmed; CA A71612 remanded for resentencing and otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Beavers, 838 P.2d 644, 115 Or. App. 752 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

838 P.2d 644 (State v. Beavers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Beavers
856 P.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)