State v. Beavers
This text of 838 P.2d 644 (State v. Beavers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of felony driving while suspended (DWS), and his probation on an earlier theft conviction was revoked. Although he has appealed in both cases by a single notice of appeal, he assigns no error to the judgment in the DWS case. In the theft case, he asserts that the trial court lacked the authority to modify a previously ordered, but unexecuted, jail sentence by ordering that it be served consecutively to an unrelated prison sentence. The state concedes that defendant is correct, and we accept the concession.
CA A71613 affirmed; CA A71612 remanded for resentencing and otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
838 P.2d 644, 115 Or. App. 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-beavers-orctapp-1992.