State v. Beasley
557 So. 2d 132, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 807, 1990 WL 11808
Opinion
While the departure order is inartfully drawn, the second and third reasons, read in light of the trial court’s remarks at sentencing, were intended to mean, and are sustainable under, point five of State v. McMullen, 529 So.2d 821, 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). See also State v. Sachs, 526 So.2d 48, 50 (Fla.1988).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Beasley, 557 So. 2d 132, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 807, 1990 WL 11808 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
557 So. 2d 132 (State v. Beasley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McMullen
529 So. 2d 821 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Sachs
526 So. 2d 48 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)