State v. Beasley
45 Ala. 81
This text of 45 Ala. 81 (State v. Beasley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Beasley, 45 Ala. 81 (Ala. 1871).
Opinion
B. F. SAFFOLD, J.
The demurrer ought to have been sustained, as the grounds set forth in the petition go to matters behind the judgment. — Marshall v. Candler, 21 Ala. 490.
As a proceeding for the correction of errors, the time in which that could be done had elapsed.
The judgment is reversed. As the motion can not be maintained, the cause is not remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bice v. Jones
236 So. 2d 718 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1970)
Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. Bradley
143 Ala. 530 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1904)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
45 Ala. 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-beasley-ala-1871.