State v. Bearden

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Bearden

DecidedJanuary 27, 2021

Docket2019-000752

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Bearden (State v. Bearden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bearden, (S.C. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State of South Carolina, Respondent,

v.

Harlin A. Bearden, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000752

Appeal From Greenwood County R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-025 Submitted January 1, 2021 – Filed January 27, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re the Care & Treatment of McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

THOMAS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI