State v. Beamish.
This text of 19 So. 2d 258 (State v. Beamish.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition of Mrs. Mervin Sidney Beamish, defendant-relatrix, who is applying for a rehearing, cannot be considered.
It is provided in Section 5 of Rule XII of the Rules of this Court, 191 La. xliv, that an application for a rehearing will not be considered in a case where the Court has refused to- grant a writ of certiorari or other supervisory writ or rule nisi. The rule of court is applicable in all cases, even when the reason given by this Court for refusing to grant a supervisory writ or rule nisi is that the judgment or order complained of is correct, and even when this Court renders an opinion explaining why the judgment or ruling complained of is *581 correct. Blaize v. Hayes, 204 La. 298, 15 So.2d 228.
For the reasons assigned, the application for a rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 So. 2d 258, 206 La. 579, 1944 La. LEXIS 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-beamish-la-1944.