State v. Beam

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Beam

389 S.W.3d 731, 2013 WL 69261, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 17

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 8, 2013·No. No. ED 97758·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paula M. Beam (“Beam”) appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting her of felony leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident. The court finds that the State’s evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident, and the trial court did not err in overruling [732] Beam’s motions for judgment of acquittal and in imposing judgment. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paula M. Beam (“Beam”) appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting her of felony leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident. The court finds that the State’s evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident, and the trial court did not err in overruling [732] Beam’s motions for judgment of acquittal and in imposing judgment. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Beam, 389 S.W.3d 731, 2013 WL 69261, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 17 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

389 S.W.3d 731 (State v. Beam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.