State v. Beal

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Beal

572 S.W.3d 163

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 23, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106095

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 572 S.W.3d 163 (State v. Beal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Beal, 572 S.W.3d 163 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Camarion Beal ("Beal") appeals from the judgment of the trial court, entered after a jury trial, convicting him of murder in the first degree, two instances of armed criminal action, and domestic assault in the first, second, and third degree. Beal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his first-degree murder conviction, claiming that the State failed to establish that Beal caused Marvin Carter's death. Because there was sufficient evidence to sustain Beal's first-degree murder conviction, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Camarion Beal ("Beal") appeals from the judgment of the trial court, entered after a jury trial, convicting him of murder in the first degree, two instances of armed criminal action, and domestic assault in the first, second, and third degree. Beal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his first-degree murder conviction, claiming that the State failed to establish that Beal caused Marvin Carter's death. Because there was sufficient evidence to sustain Beal's first-degree murder conviction, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 S.W.3d 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-beal-moctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack