State v. B.D.W.
This text of 717 So. 2d 460 (State v. B.D.W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We have for review B.D.W. v. State, 701 So.2d 629 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), wherein the district court certified the same question before this court in State v. T.M.B., 716 So.2d 269 (Fla.1998):
DOES SECTION 924.051(4), FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.1996), APPLY IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V., § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answered this question in the negative in T.M.B. We approve B.D.W.
It is so ordered.
ORDER
The Petitioner’s Motion for Rehearing and/or Clarification is hereby denied.
HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
717 So. 2d 460, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 216, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 610, 1998 WL 161895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bdw-fla-1998.