Home/Supreme Court of Minnesota/State v. Bauer

State v. Bauer

516 N.W.2d 174, 1994 Minn. LEXIS 358, 1994 WL 169981
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 29, 1994·No. C8-93-1073·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

We granted the petition of Keith Loren Bauer for review of the court of appeals’ decision affirming his conviction of sexually penetrating a 12-year-old girl 512 NW2d 112. DNA evidence was admitted at trial, including expert testimony that Bauer’s DNA profile “matched” the DNA profile of semen which the victim said Bauer had ejaculated into her mouth. Bauer argues that the trial court went too far in allowing the expert to testify that there was a “match.” We conclude otherwise. See State v. Bloom, 516 N.W.2d 159 (Minn.1994), filed herewith.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bauer, 516 N.W.2d 174, 1994 Minn. LEXIS 358, 1994 WL 169981 (Mich. 1994).

516 N.W.2d 174 (State v. Bauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Michael Holeman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2025
State of Minnesota v. Scott Jeffrey Hanson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2016
Adams v. State
955 So. 2d 1037 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
State v. Pirsig
670 N.W.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2003)
State v. Traylor
641 N.W.2d 335 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2002)
State v. Schneider
597 N.W.2d 889 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1999)
Taylor v. State
1995 OK CR 10 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1995)
State v. Bloom
516 N.W.2d 159 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1994)