State v. Batiste

283 So. 2d 244, 1973 La. LEXIS 6353
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 24, 1973·No. No. 53512·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

TATE, Justice.

The defendant was convicted of aggravated .battery, La.R.S. 14:34, and sentenced to serve four years in the penitentiary.

On appeal, his counsel argues two bills of exceptions which were reserved during the trial. La.C.Cr.P. Art. 841. However, these bills were not perfected as required by La.C.Cr.P. Arts. 844, 845, and thus do not constitute formal bills of exceptions. On review, the appellate court can consider only formal bills of exceptions. La.C.Cr.P. Arts. 844, 920. If there are none, the reviewing court can reverse only for error discoverable “by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence”. La.C.Cr.P. Art. 920(2). We find no such patent error here.

We therefore affirm the conviction and sentence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Batiste, 283 So. 2d 244, 1973 La. LEXIS 6353 (La. 1973).

283 So. 2d 244 (State v. Batiste) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Banks
294 So. 2d 541 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1974)
State v. Farner
284 So. 2d 573 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)