State v. Bates

986 N.E.2d 33, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1419
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 25, 2013
Docket2013-0591
StatusPublished

This text of 986 N.E.2d 33 (State v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bates, 986 N.E.2d 33, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1419 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

Williams App. No. WM-12-002, 2013-Ohio-1270. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ decision and request for bond pending appeal, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

O’Neill, J., dissents and would grant the stay subject to the conditions imposed by the Sixth Appellate District.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
986 N.E.2d 33, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bates-ohio-2013.