State v. Bates

North Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Bates

2004 ND 222, 691 N.W.2d 193, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 365, 2004 WL 3104761

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 14, 2004

Docket20040095

StatusPublished

This text of 2004 ND 222 (State v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bates, 2004 ND 222, 691 N.W.2d 193, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 365, 2004 WL 3104761 (N.D. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Jimmie Bates appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of gross sexual imposition. Bates argues there was insufficient evidence to convict him of the crime. Concluding there was sufficient evidence to uphold the guilty verdict, we summarily affirm the conviction under N.D.RApp.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Jimmie Bates appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of gross sexual imposition. Bates argues there was insufficient evidence to convict him of the crime. Concluding there was sufficient evidence to uphold the guilty verdict, we summarily affirm the conviction under N.D.RApp.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2004 ND 222, 691 N.W.2d 193, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 365, 2004 WL 3104761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bates-nd-2004.