State v. Bates

North Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Bates

2004 ND 222, 691 N.W.2d 193, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 365, 2004 WL 3104761

North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 2004·No. 20040095·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Jimmie Bates appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of gross sexual imposition. Bates argues there was insufficient evidence to convict him of the crime. Concluding there was sufficient evidence to uphold the guilty verdict, we summarily affirm the conviction under N.D.RApp.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Jimmie Bates appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of gross sexual imposition. Bates argues there was insufficient evidence to convict him of the crime. Concluding there was sufficient evidence to uphold the guilty verdict, we summarily affirm the conviction under N.D.RApp.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.

State v. Bates, 2004 ND 222, 691 N.W.2d 193, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 365, 2004 WL 3104761 (N.D. 2004).

Pincite

2004 ND 222 (State v. Bates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.