State v. Bates
This text of 753 So. 2d 114 (State v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Harriet BATES, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Debra Rescigno, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Peter D. Aiken, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(b), this case is summarily reversed. See State v. Hayes, 720 So.2d 1095, 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) and Johnson v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2419, D2420, ___ So.2d ___, ___ (Fla. 4th DCA Oct.28, 1998). As we did in Hayes and Johnson, we certify conflict with State v. Holland, 689 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) and State v. Perry, 716 So.2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
GUNTHER, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
753 So. 2d 114, 1998 WL 889483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bates-fladistctapp-1998.