Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Bateman

State v. Bateman

765 P.2d 249, 94 Or. App. 449, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2198
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 14, 1988
DocketC85-08-33209; C85-10-34220; CA A44854; A44855
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 765 P.2d 249 (State v. Bateman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bateman, 765 P.2d 249, 94 Or. App. 449, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2198 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a condition of probation requiring him to post certain signs on the door to his home and the sides of any motor vehicle that he operates. The court imposed the condition after defendant pled no contest to two charges of sexual misconduct in the first degree. ORS 163.425. Because the court revoked defendant’s probation after he filed these appeals, we dismiss them as moot.

Appeals dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lindquist
328 Or. App. 538 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2023)
State v. Bateman
771 P.2d 314 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
765 P.2d 249, 94 Or. App. 449, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bateman-orctapp-1988.