State v. Bateman
765 P.2d 249, 94 Or. App. 449, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2198
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 14, 1988·No. C85-08-33209; C85-10-34220; CA A44854; A44855·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals a condition of probation requiring him to post certain signs on the door to his home and the sides of any motor vehicle that he operates. The court imposed the condition after defendant pled no contest to two charges of sexual misconduct in the first degree. ORS 163.425. Because the court revoked defendant’s probation after he filed these appeals, we dismiss them as moot.
Appeals dismissed as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Bateman, 765 P.2d 249, 94 Or. App. 449, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2198 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
765 P.2d 249 (State v. Bateman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Lindquist
328 Or. App. 538 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2023)
State v. Bateman
771 P.2d 314 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)