State v. . Bateman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Bateman

165 S.E. 335, 203 N.C. 843, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 103

DecidedSeptember 14, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 165 S.E. 335 (State v. . Bateman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Bateman, 165 S.E. 335, 203 N.C. 843, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 103 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence at tbe trial of this action was properly submitted to the jury. It tended to show not only that the crime, as charged in the indictment, was committed, but also that the defendant is the person who assaulted the State’s witnesses by shooting- them with a gun. There was no error in the refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence at tbe trial of this action was properly submitted to the jury. It tended to show not only that the crime, as charged in the indictment, was committed, but also that the defendant is the person who assaulted the State’s witnesses by shooting- them with a gun. There was no error in the refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 S.E. 335, 203 N.C. 843, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bateman-nc-1932.