State v. Bateman

335 Mont. 100

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Bateman. Read the opinion of the Court — 323 Mont. 280 →

Montana Supreme Court·Decided December 5, 2006·No. Cause No. DC-01-102C·Published

Opinion

On February 16, 2006, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of four (4) years for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence for the offense of DUI, 4th or Subsequent Offense, a felony.

On November 2, 2006, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Ed Sheehy. The state was not represented.

[101]*101DATED this 5th day of December, 2006.

The Defendant having been duly informed of the amended judgment and commitment, and having waived his right to appear before the undersigned for this pronouncement of sentence, whereupon,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the sentence shall be modified to run concurrently with the Missoula County Cause Number DC-95-182. The terms and conditions shall remain as imposed in the Judgment of February 16, 2006.

Hon. Richard A. Simonton, District Court Judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On November 2, 2006, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Ed Sheehy. The state was not represented.

[101]*101DATED this 5th day of December, 2006.

The Defendant having been duly informed of the amended judgment and commitment, and having waived his right to appear before the undersigned for this pronouncement of sentence, whereupon,

Hon. Richard A. Simonton, District Court Judge.

State v. Bateman, 335 Mont. 100 (Mo. 2006).

Pincite

335 Mont. 100 (State v. Bateman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.