State v. Batchelor

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Batchelor

405 S.W.3d 640, 2013 WL 4080915, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 928

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 13, 2013·No. No. ED 98018·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment finding him guilty of possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202 RSMo 2000, in a court tried case. The trial court sentenced him to two years’ imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment finding him guilty of possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202 RSMo 2000, in a court tried case. The trial court sentenced him to two years’ imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Batchelor, 405 S.W.3d 640, 2013 WL 4080915, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 928 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

405 S.W.3d 640 (State v. Batchelor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.