State v. Bass

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bass

349 S.W.3d 473, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1280, 2011 WL 4458791

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 27, 2011

DocketED 95695

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 349 S.W.3d 473 (State v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bass, 349 S.W.3d 473, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1280, 2011 WL 4458791 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cordell Bass (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of one count of kidnapping, Section 565.110 RSMo (2000), and one count of assault in the first degree, Section 565.050 RSMo (2000). Appellant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to eighteen years’ imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently. Appellant raises one point on appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support the kidnapping conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript on appeal. The State presented sufficient evidence from which a trier of fact could have reasonably found Appellant guilty of kidnapping. State v. Peeples, 288 S.W.3d 767, 770 (Mo.App. E.D.2009). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cordell Bass (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of one count of kidnapping, Section 565.110 RSMo (2000), and one count of assault in the first degree, Section 565.050 RSMo (2000). Appellant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to eighteen years’ imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently. Appellant raises one point on appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support the kidnapping conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript on appeal. The State presented sufficient evidence from which a trier of fact could have reasonably found Appellant guilty of kidnapping. State v. Peeples, 288 S.W.3d 767, 770 (Mo.App. E.D.2009). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

349 S.W.3d 473, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1280, 2011 WL 4458791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bass-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack