State v. Bass

218 S.W.3d 28, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 495, 2007 WL 896373
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 27, 2007·No. ED 88022·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Clinton Bass, appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of receiving stolen property, in violation of section 570.080 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior offender and sentenced him to seven years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bass, 218 S.W.3d 28, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 495, 2007 WL 896373 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

218 S.W.3d 28 (State v. Bass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BAGHAZAL v. State
218 S.W.3d 28 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)