State v. Bass

467 A.2d 998, 1983 Me. LEXIS 836
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedNovember 18, 1983
StatusPublished

This text of 467 A.2d 998 (State v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bass, 467 A.2d 998, 1983 Me. LEXIS 836 (Me. 1983).

Opinion

[999]*999MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Phillip L. Bass appeals from his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B, and operating after suspension, 29 M.R.S.A. § 2184. Citing State v. Musk, 438 A.2d 472 (Me.1981), Bass argues that the judgment should be vacated because of procedural irregularity in the transfer of his case from the District Court to the Superior Court. We disagree because the record reflects no irregularity which affects substantial rights. See State v. Sylmor-Slosberg, 451 A.2d 302 (Me.1982). The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Musk
438 A.2d 472 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)
State v. Sylmor-Slosberg
451 A.2d 302 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 A.2d 998, 1983 Me. LEXIS 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bass-me-1983.