State v. Bass

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Bass

467 A.2d 998, 1983 Me. LEXIS 836

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided November 18, 1983·Published

Opinion

[999]*999MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Phillip L. Bass appeals from his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B, and operating after suspension, 29 M.R.S.A. § 2184. Citing State v. Musk, 438 A.2d 472 (Me.1981), Bass argues that the judgment should be vacated because of procedural irregularity in the transfer of his case from the District Court to the Superior Court. We disagree because the record reflects no irregularity which affects substantial rights. See State v. Sylmor-Slosberg, 451 A.2d 302 (Me.1982). The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[999]*999MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Phillip L. Bass appeals from his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B, and operating after suspension, 29 M.R.S.A. § 2184. Citing State v. Musk, 438 A.2d 472 (Me.1981), Bass argues that the judgment should be vacated because of procedural irregularity in the transfer of his case from the District Court to the Superior Court. We disagree because the record reflects no irregularity which affects substantial rights. See State v. Sylmor-Slosberg, 451 A.2d 302 (Me.1982). The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

State v. Bass, 467 A.2d 998, 1983 Me. LEXIS 836 (Me. 1983).

Pincite

467 A.2d 998 (State v. Bass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related