State v. Baskett

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Baskett

855 S.W.2d 429, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 752, 1993 WL 172028

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 25, 1993·No. No. 62537·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of conspiracy to commit first degree robbery, § 564.016, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a class X offender to a term of six years’ imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of conspiracy to commit first degree robbery, § 564.016, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a class X offender to a term of six years’ imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Baskett, 855 S.W.2d 429, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 752, 1993 WL 172028 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

855 S.W.2d 429 (State v. Baskett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.