State v. Basham

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Basham. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Haw. 97
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 9, 2013·No. SCWC-11-0000758·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000758 09-MAY-2013 10:40 AM

SCWC-11-0000758

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.

MICHAEL W. BASHAM, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant, and

ALIIKEA BASHAM, aka Aliikea I. Basham, Defendant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000758; CR. NO. 10-1-0663)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari filed on March 28, 2013, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 9, 2013.

Summer M.M. Kupau /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Basham, (haw 2013).

State v. Basham (State v. Basham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.