State v. Bartley

64 P.3d 582, 186 Or. App. 680, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 293
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 6, 2003
Docket01-6111; A115604
StatusPublished

This text of 64 P.3d 582 (State v. Bartley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bartley, 64 P.3d 582, 186 Or. App. 680, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 293 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a conviction for interfering with making a report, ORS 165.572. He was acquitted of fourth-degree assault and harassment. The trial court sentenced him to 18 months’ bench probation, including 10 days on the Clatsop County work crew, and imposed a $5,000 compensatory fine. He assigns error to the imposition of the fine on the ground that there was no causal connection between the offense for which he was convicted and the victim’s injuries. The state concedes error, and we agree.

Defendant’s other assignment of error does not require discussion.

Compensatory fine vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 165.572
Oregon § 165.572

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 P.3d 582, 186 Or. App. 680, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bartley-orctapp-2003.