State v. Bartley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Bartley

64 P.3d 582, 186 Or. App. 680, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 293

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 6, 2003·No. 01-6111; A115604·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a conviction for interfering with making a report, ORS 165.572. He was acquitted of fourth-degree assault and harassment. The trial court sentenced him to 18 months’ bench probation, including 10 days on the Clatsop County work crew, and imposed a $5,000 compensatory fine. He assigns error to the imposition of the fine on the ground that there was no causal connection between the offense for which he was convicted and the victim’s injuries. The state concedes error, and we agree.

Defendant’s other assignment of error does not require discussion.

Compensatory fine vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a conviction for interfering with making a report, ORS 165.572. He was acquitted of fourth-degree assault and harassment. The trial court sentenced him to 18 months’ bench probation, including 10 days on the Clatsop County work crew, and imposed a $5,000 compensatory fine. He assigns error to the imposition of the fine on the ground that there was no causal connection between the offense for which he was convicted and the victim’s injuries. The state concedes error, and we agree.

Defendant’s other assignment of error does not require discussion.

Compensatory fine vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

State v. Bartley, 64 P.3d 582, 186 Or. App. 680, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 293 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

64 P.3d 582 (State v. Bartley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related