State v. Bartell
89 A.2d 394, 10 N.J. 9, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 356
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court'.
*11 For affirmance — Justices Oliphant, Wacheneeld and' Burling — 3.
For reversal — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher and Jacobs — 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Bartell, 89 A.2d 394, 10 N.J. 9, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 356 (N.J. 1952).
89 A.2d 394 (State v. Bartell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
G.W. v. J.H.
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2024
State of New Jersey v. J.M., Jr.
102 A.3d 1233 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Janus v. Hackensack Hospital
330 A.2d 628 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
State v. Yormark
284 A.2d 549 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)
State v. Kearney
263 A.2d 817 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
State v. Arbus
148 A.2d 184 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Mitilenes v. Snead
132 A.2d 321 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
State v. D'Ippolito
117 A.2d 592 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1955)