State v. Barry

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Barry

23 N.E.3d 1195, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1452

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 28, 2015·No. 2014-2064·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Scioto App. No. 13CA3569, 2014-Ohio-4452. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ entry filed November 24, 2014:

“Whether a person who hides evidence of a crime that is unmistakable to him or her commits tampering with evidence in the absence of evidence that a victim or the public would report a crime?”

[1453] Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict ease is State v. Cavalier, 2nd Dist. Montgomery No. 24651, 2012-Ohio-1976.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2014-1984, State v. Barry, 4th Dist. Scioto No. 13CA3569, 2014-Ohio-4452.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scioto App. No. 13CA3569, 2014-Ohio-4452. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ entry filed November 24, 2014:

“Whether a person who hides evidence of a crime that is unmistakable to him or her commits tampering with evidence in the absence of evidence that a victim or the public would report a crime?”

[1453] Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict ease is State v. Cavalier, 2nd Dist. Montgomery No. 24651, 2012-Ohio-1976.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2014-1984, State v. Barry, 4th Dist. Scioto No. 13CA3569, 2014-Ohio-4452.

State v. Barry, 23 N.E.3d 1195, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1452 (Ohio 2015).

Pincite

23 N.E.3d 1195 (State v. Barry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related