State v. Barry

23 N.E.3d 1195, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1452
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 2015
Docket2014-2064
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 N.E.3d 1195 (State v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Barry, 23 N.E.3d 1195, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1452 (Ohio 2015).

Opinion

Scioto App. No. 13CA3569, 2014-Ohio-4452. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ entry filed November 24, 2014:

“Whether a person who hides evidence of a crime that is unmistakable to him or her commits tampering with evidence in the absence of evidence that a victim or the public would report a crime?”
[1453]*1453Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict ease is State v. Cavalier, 2nd Dist. Montgomery No. 24651, 2012-Ohio-1976.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2014-1984, State v. Barry, 4th Dist. Scioto No. 13CA3569, 2014-Ohio-4452.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gavin
2015 Ohio 2996 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 N.E.3d 1195, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barry-ohio-2015.