State v. Barry

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Barry

157 S.W.3d 769, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 378, 2005 WL 589617

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2005

DocketED 84465

StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.W.3d 769 (State v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Barry, 157 S.W.3d 769, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 378, 2005 WL 589617 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth J. Barry (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of robbery in the second degree. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in granting the state’s request to strike a member of the venire for cause, and the trial court erred in admitting certain testimony at trial. Defendant also claims that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to improperly comment on defendant’s failure to testify during the state’s closing argument.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI