State v. Barrow
727 S.E.2d 546, 366 N.C. 141, 2012 WL 2236101, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 417
Opinion
As to the issue on direct appeal, we affirm. Discretionary review was improvidently allowed as to the other issues.
AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Barrow, 727 S.E.2d 546, 366 N.C. 141, 2012 WL 2236101, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 417 (N.C. 2012).
727 S.E.2d 546 (State v. Barrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Phillip J. Larscheid
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2023
State v. Cobb
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2020
State v. Adams
795 S.E.2d 654 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)