Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Barron

State v. Barron

637 So. 2d 384, 1994 WL 248266
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 10, 1994·No. 93-1775·Published

Opinion

637 So.2d 384 (1994)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Paul BARRON, Appellee.

No. 93-1775.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 10, 1994.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The county judge granted Barron's motion to dismiss the information filed against him for misdemeanor stalking[1] on the ground it is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. The state filed this appeal. We have jurisdiction.[2]

The trial court's decision is contrary to our opinion in Bouters v. State, 634 So.2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB, W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] § 784.048(2), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1992).

[2] § 26.012, Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(b)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Barron, 637 So. 2d 384, 1994 WL 248266 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

637 So. 2d 384 (State v. Barron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bouters v. State
634 So. 2d 246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
State v. Baugher
637 So. 2d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)