State v. Barrientez

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Barrientez

520 S.W.3d 520, 2017 WL 2544759, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 572

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 13, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104497

StatusPublished

This text of 520 S.W.3d 520 (State v. Barrientez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Barrientez, 520 S.W.3d 520, 2017 WL 2544759, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 572 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Barrientez appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for first degree robbery. Finding no error, we affirm.

[521]*521An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Barrientez appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for first degree robbery. Finding no error, we affirm.

[521]*521An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 S.W.3d 520, 2017 WL 2544759, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barrientez-moctapp-2017.