State v. Barrientez

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Barrientez

520 S.W.3d 520, 2017 WL 2544759, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 572

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 2017·No. No. ED 104497·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Barrientez appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for first degree robbery. Finding no error, we affirm.

[521] An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Barrientez appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for first degree robbery. Finding no error, we affirm.

[521] An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).'

State v. Barrientez, 520 S.W.3d 520, 2017 WL 2544759, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 572 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

520 S.W.3d 520 (State v. Barrientez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.