State v. Barrett
This text of State v. Barrett (State v. Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
The State, Respondent,
v.
Gerald Barrett, Jr., Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2016-001306
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal From Beaufort County The Honorable Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 27752 Heard November 15, 2017 – Filed November 22, 2017
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Appellant Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, and Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, of Bluffton, all for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We granted Gerald Barrett's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Barrett, 416 S.C. 124, 785 S.E.2d 387 (Ct. App. 2016). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
HEARN, Acting Chief Justice, FEW and JAMES, JJ., and Acting Justices Arthur Eugene Morehead, III, and Jan B. Bromell Holmes, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Barrett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barrett-sc-2017.