State v. Barrett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Barrett

302 S.E.2d 632, 307 N.C. 126, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1835

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 19, 1982

DocketNo. 525A82

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 302 S.E.2d 632 (State v. Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Barrett, 302 S.E.2d 632, 307 N.C. 126, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1835 (N.C. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Defendant has attempted to appeal to this Court from the denial of his motion for appropriate relief by the Court of Appeals, with Becton, J., dissenting. This he cannot do. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1422(f) (Cum. Supp. 1981). Defendant’s motion is based upon N.C.G.S. 15A-1415(b)(2) (Cum. Supp. 1981). Nevertheless, the record on appeal before us discloses that defendant was convicted of crime against nature, which is not a lesser included offense of a sexual offense in the first degree. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-27.4 (1981). Therefore, we arrest judgment. The appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with direction that it further remand the case to the Superior Court of FORSYTH County for the entry of this order arresting judgment.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 19th day of November, 1982.

MARTIN, J. For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Defendant has attempted to appeal to this Court from the denial of his motion for appropriate relief by the Court of Appeals, with Becton, J., dissenting. This he cannot do. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1422(f) (Cum. Supp. 1981). Defendant’s motion is based upon N.C.G.S. 15A-1415(b)(2) (Cum. Supp. 1981). Nevertheless, the record on appeal before us discloses that defendant was convicted of crime against nature, which is not a lesser included offense of a sexual offense in the first degree. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-27.4 (1981). Therefore, we arrest judgment. The appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with direction that it further remand the case to the Superior Court of FORSYTH County for the entry of this order arresting judgment.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 19th day of November, 1982.

MARTIN, J. For the Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 S.E.2d 632, 307 N.C. 126, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barrett-nc-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack