State v. Baron, Unpublished Decision (3-13-1998)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Baron, Unpublished Decision (3-13-1998)

DecidedMarch 13, 1998

DocketNo. 97-L-065.

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Baron, Unpublished Decision (3-13-1998) (State v. Baron, Unpublished Decision (3-13-1998)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Baron, Unpublished Decision (3-13-1998), (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

CRIMINAL/CRIMINAL PROCEDURE:

A magistrate does not have authority to rule on a motion to suppress evidence. However, when a defendant fails to object to the referral or to file written objections to the magistrate's order pursuant to Crim.R. 19(C), the referral does not constitute reversible error.

CRIMINAL/DRUNK DRIVING:

R.C. 4511.19, which prohibits driving while under the influence of alcohol, does not distinguish between public and private property and courts have held that there is no difference.

CRIMINAL/TRAFFIC:

An officer is justified in stopping a vehicle when he witnesses the vehicle straddle the double yellow center line for a distance of approximately a half mile. At that point, the driver has violated R.C. 4511.25(C), driving left of center.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI