State v. Barocio

328 Or. App. 189
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 13, 2023
DocketA178292
StatusUnpublished

This text of 328 Or. App. 189 (State v. Barocio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Barocio, 328 Or. App. 189 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1). Submitted August 21, Affirmed September 13, 2023, State v. Straub, 322 Or App 393, 520 P3d 915 (2022), rev den, 370 Or 827 (2023)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARIO ALBERTO BAROCIO, Defendant-Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 22CN00009, 17CR75526; A178292 (Control), A178293

Matthew L. Tracey, Judge pro tempore. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Nora Coon, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Joanna Hershey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Hellman, Judge, and Armstrong, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Straub, 322 Or App 393, 520 P3d 915 (2022), rev den, 370 Or 827 (2023).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Straub
520 P.3d 915 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 Or. App. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barocio-orctapp-2023.