State v. Baro

435 So. 2d 408, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21772
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 3, 1983·No. No. 82-2654·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. We believe the appellee’s motion to dismiss and the state’s traverse thereto raise an issue of material fact as to appellee’s participation in the burglary that formed the basis of the charges against the appellee. Cf. State v. Davis, 243 So.2d 587 (Fla.1971).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Baro, 435 So. 2d 408, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

435 So. 2d 408 (State v. Baro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Davis
243 So. 2d 587 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)