State v. Barns
This text of 25 Tex. 654 (State v. Barns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This indictment charged that the defendant did play at a game with cards “in a certain public house.” The court sustained a motion to quash it on account of the generality [655]*655snd vagueness in stating the place at which the playing took place. The term public house is generic in its character, and is intended by the law to include all houses made public by the occupation carried on in them, as inns, taverns, storehouses for retailing liquors, or those made public by the resort of numerous persons, or in any other way. These words are not appropriate to indicate the facts which constitute the par acular offence intended to be charged. (The State v. West, 10 Tex. R., 555; Ib., 309; Arch. C. Pl., 46—7. Wharton’s A. C. L. 366 and 86, note 1.)
Judgment affirmed, .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 Tex. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barns-tex-1860.