State v. Barney

2017 Ohio 1209
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 31, 2017
Docket2017-P-0002
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 1209 (State v. Barney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Barney, 2017 Ohio 1209 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Barney, 2017-Ohio-1209.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff-Appellee, :

-vs- : CASE NO. 2017-P-0002

JERRY L. BARNEY, :

Defendant-Appellant. :

Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2009 CR 00761.

Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Jerry L. Barney, pro se, PID: A591-734, Toledo Correctional Institution, 2001 East Central Avenue, Toledo, OH 43608 (Defendant-Appellant).

COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J.

{¶1} On January 5, 2017, appellant, pro se, filed a notice of appeal. In the

description of the entry being appealed, appellant wrote in: “ineffective assistance of

counsel/lack of evidence/no credible witness/witness will to recant.” There was no

judgment entry date noted, and no judgment entry from the trial court was attached to

the notice of appeal as required by the appellate rules. {¶2} A review of the docket reflects that appellant was sentenced to life in

prison for his offenses of aggravated murder and aggravated robbery on August 30,

2010.

{¶3} Loc.R. 3(D)(2) of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals states:

{¶4} “The appellant shall attach to the Notice of Appeal a copy of the judgment

entry or entries being appealed. Appellant’s failure to attach a copy of the judgment

entry or entries may result in the dismissal of the appeal sua sponte and without notice.”

{¶5} App.R. 4(A)(1) states in relevant part:

{¶6} “* * * [a] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its

entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry. * *

*.”

{¶7} App.R. 5(A) states:

{¶8} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

{¶9} “(a) Criminal proceedings;

{¶10} “(b) Delinquency proceedings; and

{¶11} “(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings.

{¶12} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals

and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of

right. * * *.”

{¶13} In the present case, appellant failed to attach a copy of the judgment entry

from which he appeals. Additionally, if he is appealing the August 30, 2010 sentencing

2 entry, his notice of appeal was filed beyond the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R.

4(A)(1), and he has not sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Appellant should

also state his reasons for not filing his appeal within the 30-day time limit. Thus, this

court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

{¶14} Accordingly, this appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed.

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,

TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J.,

concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ohio 1209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barney-ohioctapp-2017.