State v. Barnett

247 S.W.3d 100, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 323, 2008 WL 638092
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 11, 2008·No. ED 89541·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marvin M. Barnett (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury found him guilty of third degree assault of a law enforcement offi *101 cer, Section 565.082 RSMo (2000), and driving while intoxicated, Section 577.010 RSMo (2000). Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for assault of a law enforcement officer and four years’ imprisonment for driving while intoxicated, to be served consecutively. Defendant raises three points on appeal, claiming the trial court erroneously admitted two hearsay statements and evidence of uncharged misconduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Barnett, 247 S.W.3d 100, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 323, 2008 WL 638092 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

247 S.W.3d 100 (State v. Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Foster
247 S.W.3d 100 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)