State v. Barnett

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Barnett

247 S.W.3d 100, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 323, 2008 WL 638092

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 11, 2008

DocketED 89541

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 247 S.W.3d 100 (State v. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Barnett, 247 S.W.3d 100, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 323, 2008 WL 638092 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marvin M. Barnett (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury found him guilty of third degree assault of a law enforcement offi *101 cer, Section 565.082 RSMo (2000), and driving while intoxicated, Section 577.010 RSMo (2000). Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for assault of a law enforcement officer and four years’ imprisonment for driving while intoxicated, to be served consecutively. Defendant raises three points on appeal, claiming the trial court erroneously admitted two hearsay statements and evidence of uncharged misconduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marvin M. Barnett (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury found him guilty of third degree assault of a law enforcement offi *101 cer, Section 565.082 RSMo (2000), and driving while intoxicated, Section 577.010 RSMo (2000). Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for assault of a law enforcement officer and four years’ imprisonment for driving while intoxicated, to be served consecutively. Defendant raises three points on appeal, claiming the trial court erroneously admitted two hearsay statements and evidence of uncharged misconduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 S.W.3d 100, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 323, 2008 WL 638092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barnett-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack