State v. Barnes

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Barnes

384 S.W.3d 298, 2012 WL 3662789, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1023

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 28, 2012·No. No. ED 96836·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fredrick Barnes (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of first-degree murder.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fredrick Barnes (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of first-degree murder.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Barnes, 384 S.W.3d 298, 2012 WL 3662789, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1023 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

384 S.W.3d 298 (State v. Barnes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related