State v. Barmore

66 S.W.3d 94, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2047, 2001 WL 1464240
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Barmore. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2096
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 2001·No. No. ED 78648·Published

Opinion

[95]*95 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Scott Barmore (Appellant) appeals from a judgment of the trial court convicting him of two counts of robbery in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.020.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err (1) in denying Appellant’s motion to find joinder improper and sever the two robbery charges; and (2) in overruling Appellant’s motion to suppress the two pretrial voice identifications of him. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Barmore, 66 S.W.3d 94, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2047, 2001 WL 1464240 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

66 S.W.3d 94 (State v. Barmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.