State v. Barlow

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Barlow

266 S.W.3d 865, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1413, 2008 WL 4633998

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 21, 2008

DocketED 90895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 S.W.3d 865 (State v. Barlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Barlow, 266 S.W.3d 865, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1413, 2008 WL 4633998 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Angela Kay Barlow appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found her guilty of committing violence to a Department of Corrections employee. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Angela Kay Barlow appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found her guilty of committing violence to a Department of Corrections employee. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 S.W.3d 865, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1413, 2008 WL 4633998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barlow-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack