State v. Barker
This text of 178 N.W.2d 270 (State v. Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals from a sentence of 3 years’ imprisonment after conviction upon his plea of guilty to malicious destruction of property. The assignments of error allege that the sentence was excessive.
The record shows that following the arraignment, the matter was continued for pre-sentence investigation. The pre-sentence report does not appear in the record. The record does indicate that other charges pending against the defendant were dismissed as a result of the defendant’s plea of guilty to the charge of malicious destruction of property.
The sentence imposed in this state was within the limits prescribed by the statute. § 28-572, R. R. S. 1943. There is no evidence to support the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive. A sentence within the limits prescribed by statute will not be disturbed in the absence of a showing of an abuse of discretion. State v. Sheldon, 179 Neb. 377, 138 N. W. 2d 428.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 N.W.2d 270, 185 Neb. 659, 1970 Neb. LEXIS 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barker-neb-1970.