State v. Barham
92 S.E.2d 434, 244 N.C. 80, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 645
Opinion
The defendant seriously contends that the State’s evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. A careful consideration of the evidence, however, leads us to the conclusion that it is sufficient, and we so hold. Consequently, the assignments of error, in our opinion, present no prejudicial error that would justify disturbing the verdict rendered below.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Barham, 92 S.E.2d 434, 244 N.C. 80, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 645 (N.C. 1956).
92 S.E.2d 434 (State v. Barham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Collins
100 S.E.2d 489 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)