State v. Barham
92 S.E.2d 434, 244 N.C. 80, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 645
This text of 92 S.E.2d 434 (State v. Barham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Barham, 92 S.E.2d 434, 244 N.C. 80, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 645 (N.C. 1956).
Opinion
The defendant seriously contends that the State’s evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. A careful consideration of the evidence, however, leads us to the conclusion that it is sufficient, and we so hold. Consequently, the assignments of error, in our opinion, present no prejudicial error that would justify disturbing the verdict rendered below.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Collins
100 S.E.2d 489 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 S.E.2d 434, 244 N.C. 80, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barham-nc-1956.