State v. Barge
This text of 278 P.3d 184 (State v. Barge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
William Aaron BARGE, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Chambers, Fairhurst, Stephens and González, considered at its June 5, 2012, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petitioner's "Motion to Immediately Grant Review and Grant Requested Relief" is denied. The Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Two for reconsideration in light of State v. Caton, ___ Wash.2d ___, 273 P.3d 980 (2012).
For the Court
/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 P.3d 184, 174 Wash. 2d 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barge-wash-2012.