State v. Barge

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Barge

219 S.W.3d 786, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 597, 2007 WL 1120261

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 2007

DocketED 87978

StatusPublished

This text of 219 S.W.3d 786 (State v. Barge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Barge, 219 S.W.3d 786, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 597, 2007 WL 1120261 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Crystal Barge (“Barge”) appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, the Honorable David L. Dowd presiding, after a jury convicted her of one count of First Degree Murder, in violation of Section 565.020 RSMo. (2000) 1 and one count of Armed Criminal Action, in violation of Section 571.015.

Barge brings one claim of error, and argues that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the State’s motion to set aside Barge’s plea agreement after Barge refused to testify against one of her *787 co-defendants, as required by the plea agreement.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record, the briefs of the parties, and the plea agreement at issue, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been given a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

AFFIRMED.

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo. (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI