State v. Barcliff

508 P.3d 597, 319 Or. App. 457
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 4, 2022
DocketA174904
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 508 P.3d 597 (State v. Barcliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Barcliff, 508 P.3d 597, 319 Or. App. 457 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Submitted April 11, affirmed May 4, 2022

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. YAUNIQUE EVERETTE BARCLIFF, Defendant-Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 19CR53707; A174904 508 P3d 597

Robert F. Nichols, Jr., Senior Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Anna Belais, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Patricia G. Rincon, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Powers, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Hellman, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Austin, 316 Or App 56, 501 P3d 1136 (2021).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Byers v. Dept. of Corrections (A174403)
508 P.3d 597 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
508 P.3d 597, 319 Or. App. 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barcliff-orctapp-2022.